Agenda, decisions and draft minutes

None

There were no apologies for absence.

Visiting Member Councillor Stammers declared she was a neighbour of the speaker in support of item 4.2.

Visiting Member Councillor Stammers declared she was a neighbour of the speaker in support of item 4.2.

Confirmed

The minutes of the meeting held on 14^th September 2023 were agreed and signed as a correct record.

PERMISSION

Description of application – demolition of existing 5 bedroom three storey detached house and erection of detached building for 6 self-contained flats over four storeys with associated parking and amenity spaces.

The Planner – Development Management (West) advised of the following:

-  the front sheet of the report referred to the site being adjacent to Metropolitan Open Land, however this was not the case;

-  a revised drawing of the upper ground floor plan was submitted on the 22^nd of June 2023; and,

-  a revised drawing indicating car parking spaces of sufficient size and adequate manoeuvring space was received on the 3^rd October 2023. It included the provision of an electric vehicle charging point and a condition relating to this was recommended.

It was reported that a statement in support of the application had been received from the agent. This had been circulated to Members and was also tabled at the meeting.

Oral representations in objection to the application were received at the meeting.

The Chairman considered that if permission was to be granted, further conditions should be added in relation to slab levels; ridge height; additional electric vehicle charging points; renewable sources of energy; and water harvesting, which could address concerns raised by Thames Water.

In response to questions, the Planner – Development Management (West) advised that the application site was in an area with a PTAL (Public Transport Accessibility Levels) rating of 5. The London Plan suggested that for sites within PTAL 5-6, the starting point should be car free development rather than providing car parking spaces. There was an oversupply in relation to this, but LBB Highways Officers were happy with the proposals.

Members having considered the report, objections and representations, RESOLVED that PERMISSION BE GRANTED as recommended, subject to the conditions set out in the report of the Assistant Director, Planning and with the addition of further conditions relating to slab levels; ridge height; additional electric vehicle charging points; renewable sources of energy; and water harvesting.

PERMISSION

Description of application – demolition of the existing sports clubhouse. Erection of repositioned sports pavilion, external equipment store, cycle and bin store, perimeter fencing and associated works, including new access from car park and landscaping.

The Development Management Area Team Leader (East) reported that an artist’s impression image had been received from the applicant. This had been circulated to Members and was also tabled at the meeting. The Chairman noted that the applicant had also circulated a comprehensive planning summary to Members.

Oral representations in support of the application were received at the meeting. The following responses were given to Members’ questions:

·  It was believed that the neighbouring rugby club was a two storey building, consisting of a ground floor and a floor in the eaves of the roof.

·  Staff of Millwall Community Trust, established as a charity in 1985, would deliver additional programmes. They had been delivering these services in Southwark, and most recently in Sevenoaks. The Trust had a number of resources which the club did not. These programmes would be offered at times other than Saturdays and Sundays, when the park was used by Orpington Football Club, to bring different users into the park to experience recreation and sport.

·  The footprint of the new building was smaller than that of the existing pavilion as the proposal was for a two storey build.

·  The applicant had consulted with LBB Planning Officers over four years, spending £40k. They initially sought pre-planning advice which had helped determine the location and proposals. The first application was refused as it was felt to be too large, invasive and overbearing. Following this they worked with the Football Foundation to reduce the size as much as they could.

·  Two consultations had been undertaken, the first during the pandemic lockdown period in March 2020. However it had been well publicised online, and 322 questionnaires had been hand delivered. Over 600 responses were received, mostly online, but 35 were returned questionnaires. Approximately 300 of the responders were connected with Orpington Football Club, but the other 300 were not. Overall, 93% of responses were in favour of new facilities in the park, so that indicated that there was a broad consensus for them to proceed. Following the first application being refused they had appealed to the local MP and Ward Councillors, and it was suggested that an in person consultation be held for local residents. In May 2023, an evening consultation had been held, attended by 35 local residents. They were provided with an opportunity to view the drawings and plans. Some residents had expressed concerns regarding late night parties, alcohol licences and football taking over the park – however assurances were offered in relation to these points and most attendees had left feeling reassured. They wanted to provide an excellent grassroots facility that supported its members and other park users.

·  A preliminary ecological appraisal had been undertaken – the report concluded that no harm would be caused by the proposed plans as they would “make good”  ...  view the full minutes text for item 34.2

ITEM WITHDRAWN

Description of application – erection of a one storey roof extension to provide 3no. flats and associated works, including cycle and bin store. (56 day application under Class A, Part 20, Schedule 2 to the General Permitted Development Order 2015 (as amended) with regards to transport and highways impacts, flooding risk, air traffic and defence assets impacts, contamination risks, external appearance of the building, provision of adequate natural light to habitable rooms and nationally described space standards, impact on residential amenities and protected views).

THIS REPORT WAS WITHDRAWN BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR: PLANNING.

CONSENT

Description of application – Oak tree in rear garden – Removal.

Members having considered the report and objections RESOLVED that consent to fell x 1 Oak tree be GRANTED as recommended, subject to the conditions and informatives set out in the report of the Assistant Director, Planning.

ITEM WITHDRAWN

Description of application – Yew tree - Fell.

THIS REPORT WAS WITHDRAWN BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR: PLANNING.

NO REPORTS

NO REPORTS