Report CEO1187
The Sub-Committee received its regular update
on internal audit activity across the Council, and discussed the
following matters in particular.
- The future of Internal Audit.
Following an Aligning Policy and Finance Review, which had been
considered by the Improvement and Efficiency Sub-Committee in
October, it was proposed to reduce the size of the Internal Audit
Team to a Head of Internal Audit and six auditors, four devoted to
Bromley work and two to sold services with LB Greenwich and Academy
Schools. A 40% reduction in auditor days to around 700 to 750 for
Bromley work would be required. Staff were currently being
consulted on the proposals. Servicing
the Sub-Committee’s meetings used considerable management
resources, so Members accepted that it would be appropriate to
reduce the scheduled meetings to three per annum, with more
information briefings being circulated. The Chief Internal Auditor
informed the Sub-Committee that he did have reservations about the
scale of the reduction, which would leave Bromley with one of the
lowest internal audit coverages in London. He had discussed this
with the Chief Executive, who had undertaken to buy in additional
support in the event of significant fraud cases or other
unpredicted levels of unplanned work.
- Academy Schools. It was confirmed
that a stand-alone unit was in place to deal with Academies. The
fee of £290 per day was considered to be competitive, but
Internal Audit needed to market their service effectively. It was
also commented that there should be a proper cost-base so that the
Council was not under-cutting unfairly other providers.
- Review of ACS Debtors. A report had
been submitted to Adult and Community PDS Committee in November
setting out the new actions being taken to reduce the level of
outstanding debt, including fortnightly arrears meetings. Internal
Audit would monitor the situation and report back as
necessary.
- Risk Management. The Sub-Committee
noted the Corporate Risks set out in Appendix G to the report
– a senior officer would be named for each risk, although in
some cases they had not yet been allocated. The Vice-Chairman
reminded officers about the need to put values against risks
– it was confirmed that this had been attempted where
possible.
- Audit Plan Progress (Appendix B)
Councillor Nicholas Bennett requested a copy of the Communications
Audit report, and noted that there was limited assurance on the HR
Agency Staff review. On the Information Requests audit, he stated
that it was essential to have a central coordinator for Freedom of
Information requests, and that Members needed more information
about the pattern of requests. He was concerned that Members were
not aware of the decisions being taken by officers about the future
of this service, and suggested that this issue needed to be flagged
up at the next meeting of the General Purposes and Licensing
Committee. The Chief Internal Auditor confirmed that the proposals
had arisen out of the need to achieve budget savings in the central
departments, and that in some cases the central coordination role
might be carried out in other departments.
RESOLVED that
(1)
The updates in the report and the continuing
achievements of the counter fraud benefit partnership with
Greenwich Council be noted.
(2)
The Sub-Committee notes that Aligning Policy and
Finance review of Internal Audit and the budget savings proposed as
part of the Council’s challenging but necessary savings
targets.
(3)
The Sub-Committee notes the valuable work of Internal
Audit both in conducting “value for money” assessments
and in ensuring that the financial information provided to Members
and managers is of sufficient quality to make reliable and quality
decisions, particularly in the light of the current financial
challenges facing all of the Council.
(4)
The Sub-Committee also notes the key role played by
Internal Audit (in conjunction with the Joint Fraud partnership
with LB Greenwich) and in particular the significant increase in
reports and cases of fraud seen across the public sector recently,
and the call on audit resources that this has required and which
will continue to do so in the current economic climate.