Agenda item

PORTFOLIO HOLDER UPDATE

Minutes:

The Portfolio Holder for Children, Education and Families, Cllr Peter Fortune, attended the meeting to respond to questions from the Committee. The Portfolio Holder gave a brief introduction highlighting the following issues –

 

  • The temporary site for Bullers’ Wood School for Boys had opened in September and the boys had settled in well.  A Public Enquiry to determine the second planning application had taken place and the outcome of the Enquiry was expected by 16th January 2019.
  • A new Director of Education had been appointed and would start in January 2019.  The Portfolio Holder thanked the Interim Director of Education, Gillian Palmer, for her exceptional work over the past year.
  • A meeting had taken place with the Chairman of the Spring Partnership MAT.  Any ongoing work would be fed back to the Committee.
  • The Portfolio Holder had attended the London Youth Games where Bromley had retained its title.  The Portfolio Holder encouraged Members of the Committee to attend any future Games if possible.
  • Meetings had been held with Primary and Secondary Head Teachers to discuss ongoing funding issues.  The Portfolio Holder stressed the need for the Local Authority to work collaboratively with schools in order to lobby where necessary.
  • The Portfolio Holder had been in touch with the Education for the 21st Century Trust and the Regional Schools Commissioner to ask that the Local Authority be kept updated in relation to ongoing investigations.  The Portfolio Holder reported that the DfE had appointed external trustees to monitor the Trust.
  • Since the last meeting the Portfolio Holder had visited a number of schools.
  • The Corporate Parenting Fun Day had been a success and the young people had really valued the attendance and participation by Members.
  • During the Practice Week that had been held the Portfolio Holder had spent a day with the Court Team seeing the valuable work that the Team did.
  • Social Worker recruitment was going well and the positive messages coming from the Local Authority were having an impact.
  • The Trailblazer funding had been secured.
  • During November, Ofsted had come in for an unannounced three week inspection of Children’s Services.  The quality assurance process was currently underway and until this was complete the final outcome of the inspection would not be known.  However, during the feedback session the Inspectors reported that they had found no evidence of inadequate practice.  In addition to this the inspectors recognised that social workers knew the children well.  Recognising that the improvements that had been delivered within Children’s Services were the result of hard work and improvement across the Council, the Portfolio Holder thanked all Members and staff for their hard work and support.

 

Cllr Fortune then responded to questions, making the following comments –

 

  • The Local Authority had submitted an application to the Secretary of State for Education for a disapplication request for the transfer of £1m from the Schools Block of the DSG to the high Needs Block.  It had been important to explain to Head Teachers why the transfer of funds was necessary and moving forward there was an acknowledgement that the Local Authority needed to be transparent about the process.  Nationally there were concerns around High Needs Funding.  The disapplication request for 2018/19 had been approved by the Secretary of State.  The imbalance of funding had occurred a few years before when funds were transferred from the High Needs Block to the Schools Block, this transfer had then been erroneously set in stone when the DfE had undertaken a rebalancing of budgets.  The disapplication request would have no impact on the proposed SEN facility in the Borough as the provision sat separately from the funding.
  • Feedback from parents clearly indicated that there was a demand for local provision.  There was no intention to move children that had been placed in out of borough provision but children entering the system would be placed in the local provision where appropriate.  At the same time the Glebe Secondary School had been asked to shift its focus so that they were the local school of choice for children with ASD.  Whilst Glebe was on the Borough boundary, Officers did not consider that there would be any overlap with the new ASD Free School in Croydon.
  • The bid for the new specialist provision had been informed by evidence of need.  During a comprehensive analysis the needs of all the children in the cohort had been reviewed.  Officers were confident that that there was a local need and that children would want to be placed in the new provision.
  • The SEND4Change report had highlighted that in Bromley there were significantly more children in the Independent Sector than the national average and this was skewing how funding in the High Needs Block was spent.
  • The Portfolio Holder had visited Biggin Hill Airport over half term to see a programme that was being run.  There was no further update on the Aeronautical College at Biggin Hill and the Portfolio Holder understood that a different site was under consideration.
  •  As schools moved to academy status there was no requirement to follow the RE Syllabus set by the local SACRE (Standing Advisory Council for Religious Education).  The Portfolio Holder noted that Members were currently committed to SACRE and he could not see that changing any time soon.
  • A date in March had been agreed for the Pupil Place Planning Working Group.  There was a recognition that there was a need to involve the public in pupil place planning.
  • The Portfolio Holder was reminded that he was expected at meetings of the Education Budget and Performance Monitoring Sub-committee.