Issue - meetings

(12/00587/FULL6) - 16 Oakley Drive, Bromley

Meeting: 02/08/2012 - Plans Sub-Committee No. 3 (Item 10)

10 (DRR12/094) - 16 Oakley Drive, Bromley - Details of Condition 3 of Application 12/00587 relating to Obscure Glazing. pdf icon PDF 54 KB

Decision:

BREACH OF CONDITION NOTICE AUTHORISED (6 WEEKS TO COMPLY)

Minutes:

Oral representations in favour of action being taken were received at the meeting.  Comments from Ward Member, Councillor Alexa Michael, in favour of a breach of condition notice being authorised were reported.

Members having considered the report and representations, RESOLVED THAT AUTHORITY BE GRANTED FOR THE ISSUE OF A  ...  view the full minutes text for item 10

Action By: Chief Planner/RD


Meeting: 26/04/2012 - Plans Sub-Committee No. 4 (Item 31)

31 (12/00587/FULL6) - 16 Oakley Drive, Bromley. pdf icon PDF 135 KB

Decision:

PERMISSION

 

Minutes:

Description of application - Detached garage to rear.  RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION.

 

Oral representations in objection to and in support of the application were received at the meeting.

Members having considered the report, objections and representations, RESOLVED that PERMISSION BE GRANTED as recommended, subject to the condition set out in the report of the Chief Planner with the addition of the following 2 conditions:-

‘2  The additional accommodation shall be used only by members of the household occupying the dwelling 16 Oakley Drive and shall not be severed to form a separate self-contained unit.

Reason: In order to comply with Policy H8 of the Unitary Development Plan, to ensure that the accommodation is not used separately and unassociated with the main dwelling and so as to prevent an unsatisfactory sub-division into two dwellings.

3  Before the development hereby permitted is first occupied, the proposed window(s) and door on the side (west) elevation shall be obscure glazed in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and shall subsequently be permanently retained as such.

Reason: In order to comply with Policy BE1 of the Unitary Development Plan and in the interest of the amenities of the adjacent properties.’