Issue - meetings

REFUSED

Description of application - Part one/two storey rear extension, roof alterations to include side dormers, front porch and elevational alterations including front bay window.

Oral representations in objection to and in support of the application were received at the meeting.

Councillor Joel had visited the site and supported the application.  Councillors Fawthrop and Simon Jeal had concerns at the loss off daylight and the impact on the residential amenity on 35 Marion Crescent.

Members having considered the report, objections and representations, RESOLVED that PERMISSION BE REFUSED AGAINST THE CHIEF PLANNER’S RECOMMENDATION on the grounds that:-

1.  The proposed extension would have a detrimental effect on the amenities of the adjoining occupiers at No. 35 Marion Crescent, contrary to Policies BE1 and H8 of the Unitary Development Plan (2006) and Policies 6 and 37 of the Emerging Local Plan (2016).