Issue - meetings

BUDGET MONITORING 2021/22

Meeting: 23/11/2021 - Adult Care and Health Policy Development and Scrutiny Committee (Item 39)

39 BUDGET MONITORING 2021/22 pdf icon PDF 211 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Report FSD21066

 

The Committee considered a report providing the budget monitoring position for 2021/22 for the Adult Care and Health Portfolio, based on activity up to the end of September 2021.

 

The Director of Finance highlighted that the Adult Care and Health Portfolio was in a good position this year with COVID funding and hospital discharge funding having been received. However following the government spending review it had been confirmed that no further specific COVID funding would be received next year and therefore consideration would need to be given for use of the money already received to deal with the pressures ahead.

 

The Director of Finance noted that further funding was expected this year in relation to hospital discharge, which would be reflected in the next Budget Monitoring report presented to the Committee. Members were advised that the challenge would be the following year when no specific money for hospital discharge had been made available to Local Authorities – long hospital waiting lists had been highlighted in the media, and there was likely to be a need to try and get patients in and out of hospital as quickly as possible which was bound to have an impact. This would be discussed in further detail with the Director of Adult Social Care as part of making a case for funding next year from the SE London ICS.

 

A Member noted that the current overspend for Assessment and Care Management – Care Placements was estimated at £2,455k, with the bulk of it relating to residential and nursing home placements and enquired if there had been a spike in the number of placements or an increase in fees. The Director of Finance noted that assumptions had been made at government level that residential and nursing home costs may reduce, however other significant costs pressures, such as Long Covid and the transition between young people and adult placements, were now being faced. These pressures had been anticipated and were referenced in the Social Care transformation work, which was continuing, and some changes needed time to be implemented.

 

In response to questions, the Director of Adult Social Care advised that a number of Learning Disabilities reviews had taken place. There were significant cost pressures associated with young people transitioning into Adult Services, and the department were now working with these young people earlier. The Assistant Director for Integrated Commissioning was also looking at commissioning local services that were cost effective. It was further noted that the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) undertook a review of spending each year, which had shown that spending on young people was an outlier for the Council. Spending on older people was below the national average, however this was skewed by the high number of people who funded private care. There was a programme in place to review high-cost placements – this had been held back by the pandemic as negotiations could be delicate and needed to be held face to face, but it was hoped  ...  view the full minutes text for item 39