Issue - meetings

Members discussed the possibility of co-opting independent members to the Committee. At the moment, the adoption of independent members would be voluntary as it was not something that was currently a statutory requirement. Members seemed to generally agree that up to two members could be appointed and a discussion took place as to whether or not they should be suitably qualified or whether an inquiring mind would be sufficient. The matter of who would be responsible for interviewing the independent members was discussed and it was suggested that any independent member could be appointed for a four year term. This would involve a small amendment to the constitution and need to be approved by full Council.

The Chairman expressed the view that the length of time proposed for the appointment  process in the report  (1 year) was too long and he felt that an independent member could be appointed within a three month time frame. Most Members seemed to be of the opinion that suitable experience or qualifications would be preferable

It was decided that the Vice Chairman and Chairman would agree a person specification and the matter should be progressed and be presented to the next Full Council meeting.

RESOLVED that:

1) Up to two Independent Members should be co-opted to the Audit and Risk Management Committee.

2) The Chairman and Vice Chairman would agree a person specification document for an Independent Member of the Audit and Risk Management Committee.

3) The proposal to appoint up to two Independent Members should be presented to Full Council for approval.

4) If approved by Full Council, the recruitment process would begin.