Agenda and minutes

Pensions Committee - Tuesday 3 February 2015 7.00 pm

Venue: Bromley Civic Centre

Contact: Keith Pringle  020 8313 4508

Items
No. Item

21.

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE AND NOTIFICATION OF SUBSTITUTE MEMBERS

Minutes:

There were no apologies for absence.

22.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

23.

LOCAL PENSION BOARD pdf icon PDF 265 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Report FSD15013

 

The Sub-Committee considered a report outlining proposed changes to the structure and governance arrangements of Local Government Pension Schemes (LGPS) brought about by the Public Service Pensions Act 2013 and associated Regulations and seeking  the required approvals for the establishment of a Local Pension Board. Final regulations and guidance had since been issued and a supplementary paper was circulated setting out the latest position, although further information was still awaited. The most fundamental change was that the regulations now allowed for a Local Pension Board to be combined with an existing Committee, subject to the approval of the Secretary of State. If Bromley were to submit an application for a Combined Board which was approved then the Local Pension Board would be disbanded. Officers advised that the criteria and associated conditions were still awaited but it might be possible to establish a Combined Board with General Purposes and Licensing Committee. However, it was likely that there would be complications involved in this approach and it might require the membership of the Committee to be reviewed to ensure that the requirements of the Regulations were met. The key was to secure approval for a Local Pension Board in line with the statutory timescales for its establishment and then consider whether a Combined Board would provide a suitable alternative arrangement once further information became available. 

 

The Sub-Committee considered that the establishment of a Local Pension Board was completely unnecessary for an authority that already ran its pension scheme effectively, with existing good governance and in an open and transparent way, but they were advised that it was a statutory requirement. As a minimum, the Board had to comprise four people (two employer representatives and two scheme member representatives) who had to have the capacity to represent employers and members respectively. Generally, it was for the Administering Authority to determine the detailed remit and terms of reference of the Board in accordance with the Regulations. It was proposed that the Board would meet twice a year and produce an annual report, but the Sub-Committee considered that it should meet only once a year supported by attendance at Sub-Committee meetings. 

 

Members were concerned that the costs of the proposed Local Pension Board should be minimised and were informed that any legal, financial or other advice or support would normally come from existing internal Council resources. The Sub-Committee supported the proposal that Board Members  would not be paid an allowance but would be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred. Individual Board Members had certain personal responsibilities and legal obligations and enquiries were under way to ensure that they would be adequately covered through the Council’s existing insurance arrangements, but Members noted that this could not cover reputational risk. 

 

RESOLVED that

 

(1)  The Pensions Investment Sub-Committee having considered the report notes and agrees the recommendations subject to writing to the Secretary of State as follows:-

 

This Sub-Committee views the introduction of Pension Boards in local authorities such as Bromley Council causes duplication, both an  ...  view the full minutes text for item 23.