Agenda item

PORTFOLIO HOLDER UPDATE

Minutes:

The Portfolio Holder for Children, Education and Families, Cllr Peter Fortune, attended the meeting to respond to questions from the Committee.  The Portfolio Holder gave a brief introduction highlighting the following issues:-

 

  • The 5 weeks since the last meeting had been busy as a result of pressures around the pandemic.  Prior to the start of the meeting the Portfolio Holder had circulated an update to elected Members setting out the work that had been undertaken by the Department to support children and families across the Borough.
  • The Portfolio Holder paid tribute to parents, teachers, and staff in education settings who had only just emerged from an “incredibly testing” period over the last three months.  It was highlighted that throughout the period of partial school closure teachers and key worker children had remained in schools.
  • The Portfolio Holder recognised that it had been a very challenging period for the children and students themselves, it was important to note that there was an ongoing collective responsibility to ensure that the gap in education that had been created by the pandemic was filled.
  • Schools fully reopened on Monday 8th March and so far the reports had been very good.  The Director of Education and his Team had remained in contact with schools and the feedback was that there was adherence with all the safety measures that had been put in place and testing was going particularly well.
  • It had been a year of almost insurmountable challenge and it was important that everyone in the community felt protected and supported.  To this end further details would be circulated setting out a suite of measures in respect the support offered to children and families to address the various impacts of the pandemic.  A digital health and wellbeing toolkit had been sent to schools.  Furthermore, a dedicated MASH line for teachers had been opened to facilitate direct contact with the Local Authority in the event that schools identified concerns.  A parenting support booklet had been circulated and there were dedicated single points of contact for all the schools.  The Council was also working very closely with Bromley Y to provide extra wrap around support for mental health consultation.
  • With just over 2 weeks until the Easter Holidays, attention was now turning to the provision of holiday activities in compliance with the restrictions that would still be in place and extending the opportunity for food vouchers to support those families requiring this support.
  • The Department was continuing to support Early Years settings with most of the settings now fully open and operational.
  • A keen eye was being kept on the children for whom the Local Authority had Corporate Parenting responsibility and a number of Members had recently attended the celebration events.
  • In terms of the allocation of secondary school places, figures were now available, and these demonstrated that Bromley remained above the London average in terms of the children allocated their first-place preference.
  • The Portfolio Holder thanked the PDS Committee for its welcome challenge over the last 12-month period.  The Portfolio Holder paid testament to the extraordinary staff for their “continued grit, determination, dedication, commitment and compassion” during what had been an extremely challenging period.

 

Cllr Fortune then responded to questions making the following comments:-

 

  • Funding for the holiday program was for holiday activities rather than academic catch up. Separate academic recovery funding had been made available to schools to help teachers provide extra lessons and extra support to narrow the inevitable gaps that will have emerged as a result of the pandemic.  The Local Authority was working with schools to provide support and best practice.  Narrowing the attainment gaps would be a key focus going forward.
  • In terms of teacher assessment of the impact of home learning, there would be wider teacher assessments once children had settled back into school.  The priority for the first week back had been the welfare of children.  Members noted that teachers were used to undertaking this type of baseline assessment and identifying strategies to ensure that children made the necessary progress.
  • Schools were keen to ensure that the environment was safe for teachers, staff and students and reports had indicated that compliance with the safety measures within schools had been high. 
  • The pandemic had hit industries in a range of ways and there had been a clear impact on entrance jobs for young people, particularly those young people for whom the local authority had responsibility.  The situation was being closely monitored and steps were being taken to ensure that young people were adequately supported.  An Education, Employment and Training (EET) Strategy had been developed to focus on those young people that become Not in Education Employment or Training (NEET) to ensure that as recovery from the pandemic started those young people were provided with the support they need.
  • The opening of Council premises was being reviewed corporately.  Throughout the pandemic Children’s Centers had been opened but to a greatly reduced footfall.  Over the next few weeks there would be a review of how premises could fully reopen, and staff could be safety brought back to deliver services.  There would also be a review of any new ways of working that would be required.  It was clear that a flexible approach would need to be adopted which enabled the Local Authority and its staff to respond to situations as they arose.

 

The Committee thanked the Portfolio Holder for the update.