Agenda item

REFUSED

Description of application – Two storey side and single storey rear extension.

Oral representations in objection to the application were received.  Oral representations from Ward Member, Councillor Douglas Auld in objection to the application were received at the meeting.

Members having considered the report, objections and representations, RESOLVED that PERMISSION BE REFUSED for the following reasons:-

1.  The proposed extension would, by reason of its close proximity to No. 3 Hillview Crescent, have a seriously detrimental effect on the daylighting to the ground floor flank windows of this adjoining house which the occupants of that dwelling might reasonably expect to be able to continue to enjoy, contrary to Policies H8, H9 and BE1 of the Unitary Development Plan.

 2.  The proposed extension would, by reason of the lack of side space to the boundary with 3 Hillview Crescent, have a detrimental impact on the spatial standards, and character and appearance of the area, contrary to Policies H8, H9 and BE1 of the Unitary Development Plan.

 3.  The proposed extension by reason of the amount and design of built development, would constitute an overdevelopment of the site, harmful to the spatial standards, character and appearance of the area, contrary to Policies H8, H9 and BE1 of the Unitary Development Plan.