Agenda item

THE NATIONAL FUNDING FORMULA 2023/24

Minutes:

Report CEF22062

 

The report provided details of the National Funding Formula for 2023/24 and the provisional allocations.

 

On the 19th July 2022, the Department for Education (DfE) published the illustrative 2023/24 funding for schools under the National Funding Formula. A technical note, published alongside the figures, set out the design of the NFF for 2023/24 for the Schools, High Needs, and Central blocks. Illustrative allocations for Early Years funding had been published separately as part of the early years’ consultation published on the 4th July 2022 and had been circulated previously.

 

2023/24 was the first year of the transition to the ‘direct’ schools NFF, whereby all mainstream schools across England would be funded through the same national formula without allowing for adjustment through local funding formulae. Therefore, in 2023/24, local authorities would only be allowed to use NFF factors in their local formula and, excluding the locally determined premises factors, must use all NFF factors. Bromley were currently following the NFF as far as possible and this was not an issue. Highlighted changes were:

a) The 2022/23 supplementary schools grant would be rolled into the NFF by adding grant figures to the baseline data and uplifting the minimum per pupil values by the grant’s basic per pupil values.

b) Local Authorities must move their local formula factor at least 10% closer to the NFF. Bromley were in the main already very close to NFF figures and this should pose no significant issues

c) Local authorities must identify a notional budget for their mainstream schools, that could help them comply with their duty to meet the special educational needs of their pupils. Bromley already did this through the APT.

For the Schools, High Needs and Central Blocks the National average overall increase was 2.7%. Bromley’s increase was 2.6%. The London average was 2.4%. Further details were set out in appendix 1 of the report.

 

In response to a question, the Head of Children Education and Families Finance confirmed that the 1.6% increase in funding was in addition to the supplementary grant which had been rolled into the baseline.

 

Members of the Schools Forum noted that as a result of increasing inflation (which was likely to reach 13%) an MFG of 0.5% amounted to a real terms funding cut per pupil of 12.5%.  Members noted that was one eighth of a budget.  The purpose of an MFG was to stop cliff edges and a proposed 0.5% with a cut of 12.5% amounted to a cliff edge and in light of this the MFG needed to be significantly bigger – more than inflation – to have any impact.  Members of the Schools’ Forum highlighted that with high levels of inflation, school budgets were effectively being cut and the current position was unsustainable.  It was noted that it appeared that the DfE had not supported salary increases for teachers and support staff and the resulting impact on schools would be significant with an even bigger impact on special schools.  Ultimately there would be job losses as schools were not in a position to afford the increases.  This coupled with increases in energy bills and exponential increases in the number of EHCPs was unsustainable and, ultimately, it would be young people who would suffer the biggest impact from these real terms funding cuts.

 

The Director of Education highlighted that the LA worked very closely with schools and had engaged with head teachers at both primary and secondary level.  These concerns around pressures on schools’ budgets had previously been discussed and relayed back to the DfE at fortnightly React meetings.

 

The Forum recognised that High Needs would continue to be a challenging area and there was a need to work through the detail in order to fully understand the impact.

 

The Forum also noted that a further report, setting out calculations based on Autumn pupil numbers along with information about the Growth Fund and the Falling Rolls Fund, would be presented to the Schools’ Forum in January 2023.  The Chairman further noted that in January the Forum would have to put forward an MFG percentage and the issues raised by headteachers around inflationary pressures would be highly relevant as all schools were suffering in terms of trying to balance their budgets.

 

RESOLVED: That the report be noted.



 

 

Supporting documents: