Agenda item

APPROVED

Addition of electric gates to front of property.

An oral presentation of the application was received from Planning which updated the recommendation to add impact on the ASRC to the reason for refusal.

An oral representation in support of the application was received from the applicant. Members heard that Birchwood Road is a long straight road, often used as a cut through to shops in Petts Wood. The road is often busy with people driving both recklessly and at speed. Over the last three years the volume of traffic and frequency of speeding has increased. The Speaker stated that he had to bear the cost of repairing his wall after an accident caused a lot of damage, and he is concerned for the safety of his children.

The Committee heard that the proposed gates have been designed in a sympathetic way, in-keeping with the style of the home, other properties in the road and other gates already in place at other houses. In addition, it is felt that the low-level aspect and open design of the gates will not create any visual intrusion or impact, with the gates planned to finish just above the existing brick piers. This is also seen to be in accordance with the requirements of Areas of Special Residential Character (ASRCs).

An oral representation was then received from Ward Member, Councillor Onslow in support of the application. Councillor Onslow stated that he is aware of the Conservation Status of the area and the guidance around ASRCs. However, it is felt that this application should be considered on its individual merits, with Members still mindful of the impact on the Conservation Area and the ASRC.

Councillor Onslow confirmed his understanding and support for the applicant’s fears over speeding traffic and reckless driving in Birchwood Road, together with his desire to protect his family. This is coupled with the additional security the gates will provide to enable the applicant to protect his property.

The Committee heard Councillor Onslow’s view that the proposed design of the gates complements the low-level walls and pillars in the front garden, and as they would match the height of the existing pillars would not be obtrusive with minimal impact.

Following the presentation, the Chairman referred to written comments provided by Ward Member, Councillor Fawthrop in support of the recommendation for refusal, with the comments circulated to Members at the meeting. Councillor Fawthrop highlighted parts of the Areas of Special Residential Character (ASRCs) policy and guidance, and the importance of maintaining these areas.

Ward Councillor and Committee Member, Councillor Owen, then addressed the Committee to reinforce his view that Conservation Areas are put in place for a reason and every effort should be made to maintain them, including the need to retain low walls and open gardens in such cases. Councillor Owen confirmed his agreement to Officers’ recommendation to refuse the application.

During discussions by Members, it was mentioned that roads have changed over the years becoming more dangerous and people have the right to ensure the safety of their family and also the security of their property. Some Members also confirmed their view that the gates were a suitable design and sympathetic to the surroundings.

A motion to REFUSE the application in line with Officers’ recommendations was then voted on but not carried.

Members having considered the report, objections and representations then RESOLVED that PERMISSION BE GRANTED for the following reason:

The application would respect the ASRC and not harm the character or appearance of the conservation area; it would additionally increase the safety and security of occupiers.

and,

Subject to updated plans showing the gates not exceeding the height of the piers and such conditions the Assistant Director (Planning) considers necessary.