Agenda item

APPLICATION FOR A NEW PREMISES LICENCE AT ROEBUCKS CRICKET CLUB WEST COMMON ROAD HAYES BROMLEY BR2 7BY

Minutes:

The Application

 

The application was for a new premises licence for the provision of live and recorded music from 13.00 to 23.00 hours every day and the supply of alcohol on the premises from 12.00 to 23.00 hours every day. The application stated that that both amplified, unamplified live and recorded music will be played in the 18m x 6m marquee only.

 

Case for the Applicant

 

The owner of the club advised that the cricket club was started in 2005 on a playing field at Colfe school. In 2013 his family acquired the cricket ground in West Common Road. The club relied on voluntary support and sponsorship. There was a constant need to raise money, hence the decision to acquire the marquee. The club has a 1st X1 and 2nd X1 playing in the Kent Cricket League. It also had a junior cricket section and was trying to encourage youngsters into cricket. The cricket club also had Sunday football at the ground. If a premises licence was granted, the intention would be that the marquee would be let primarily for Members of the club.  The aim would be not to take bookings for stag or hen parties or for 18/21 birthday parties. Example of the types of functions to be held under the licence would be children’s birthday parties, anniversary parties etc. If a licence was refused the impact on the Club’s finances would be severe and the club may have to sell the ground.

 

In response to a question as to why the Club Premises Certificate was not sufficient, the Sub-Committee was advised that the applicant wanted to take bookings from the general public. The owner advised that it was difficult to comply with the advance notice requirements for temporary event notices given the cricket club is more a hobby than a business. The applicant was prepared to consider a noise limiter and also using material that might reflect sound back into the marquee. The club was also prepared to accept a limit on the number of events with the indication that 8 events would be the minimum. The maximum capacity of the marquee was between 100-120.

 

The applicant was surprised by the volume of objections generated by the application. The owner accepted that mistakes had been made. The club was prepared to work with the Council in the future to ensure the events were properly organised. On one occasion the club itself turned off the music when an event organiser failed to respond to a request to turn the music down. The advertising complained of by residents had been discontinued and was not an indicator of the future intentions of the club.

 

Case for the Objectors

 

The Council’s public health nuisance team advised that a number of events had been held over the Summer 2023 giving rise to complaints regarding loud music coming from events being held in the Marquee. On 6th September 2023, a Noise Abatement Notice was served by the Council. The team maintained its objection and pointed out that the venue was a marquee with no soundproofing. Although the owner said he was aiming to hold for a limited number of events, the licence sought was for 7 days a week. It was not felt that a particular level could be set using a noise limiter given the construction of the marquee. Certain sounds (for example bass music) can create more noise than others.

 

The Council also received 29 written objections from nearby residents, some of whom also attended the hearing. Local residents advised that over the past few years there had been several occasions when noise from events at the premises reached an unacceptable level. More than one resident reported being able to hear the noise from within their house. Some residents challenged the information provided by the club referring to the advertising of the marquee as a party venue and for weddings, stag and hen parties. The objections also challenged the application saying a marquee because of its construction could not be a suitable venue to hold events. Concerns were also raised concerning anti-social behaviour from those attending events and concerning traffic generation.

 

Reasons for Decision

 

The Committee considered the amended application, the written and oral representations, the Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy and statutory guidance. It noted that the evidence from the Council’s Public Health Nuisance Team that events being held under the Club Premises Certificate had been of such concern in terms of statutory nuisance as to lead to the service of an abatement notice. It also noted the evidence of other residential objectors that noise from events being held were of sufficient volume as to be heard within their houses. If so, the noise would also be heard from within nearby residential gardens which could be disturbing.

 

However, the Committee also noted the evidence from the club that events in future would be of a different character and likely to be quieter in nature. The club was prepared to accept a limit on the number of events to be held. The club was prepared to use a noise limiter although it was noted that such a measure was not supported by the Public Health Team. The Panel noted the existence of the abatement notice, but that has its own appeal system and method of enforcement.

 

Having considered all the representations, it was deter that a limited number of events could be held at the marquee but only if quieter events were selected. Effective management would be a key component of this and an adequate number of staff would need to be engaged by the club, both during the event and at its conclusion. It was felt that by conditions the Council could specify the number of staff needed for larger events and also by condition ensure appropriate risk assessments were made for those events. The Committee noted the lack of communication being extended by the Club to nearby local residents, but felt this could be addressed by a condition requiring a dedicated phone line.

 

Given the residential nature of the area surrounding the premises, it was  considered that the appropriate balance between the interests of the club and nearby residents, could be made by limiting the number of events to 12.

 

The Committee took into account the aims of the club to develop cricket and in particular junior cricket, but its responsibility was to make decisions in accordance with the licensing objectives, in this case to prevent public nuisance.

 

Decision

 

The application was permitted subject to the following conditions:

 

1.  No more than 12 events shall be held in any calendar year.

 

2.  The conditions suggested by the police in their letter dated 27th September 2023 shall be imposed, save that condition 5 of that letter shall refer to 120 attendees and not 499 attendees.

 

3.  A written risk assessment shall be carried out before any event involving more than 50 attendees is held. The risk assessment shall among other matters state the policies to deal with alcohol and drug misuse and shall be made available on request for inspection by either the Licensing Authority or the Police

 

4.  At least one manager and two staff members shall be present at all times during any event with more than 50 attendees.

 

5.  Members of staff shall be available at the conclusion of an event with the aim of ensuring that attendees leave the event quietly.

 

6.  A dedicated phone number shall be made available and publicised on the Club’s website to enable nearly local residents to contact the Club and raise any concerns. The phone line shall be in operation during an event.

 

7.  The Club shall seek advice from the Council’s Environmental Health Officer as to possible measures to limit the breakout of noise from the use of the marquee.

 

 

Supporting documents: