Agenda item

REFUSED

Following a presentation from Planning, an oral representation in objection to the application was received from a neighbour of the property.

Members heard that the proposed plans would have a detrimental effect on neighbouring properties by way of a loss of light and privacy, together with possible future drainage problems. The plans would also have an adverse effect on the overall look of the area and be out of character, with the outward appearance destroying the symmetry of the existing row of houses.

Ward Councillor and Committee Member, Councillor Alisa Igoe, then addressed the committee in objection to the application, confirming that there had been a number of neighbour complaints to the plans. Members heard that this is seen as an overdevelopment of the site that will have a detrimental effect on the character and appearance of the area. All the houses in the road have garages in-between, contributing to the distinct look and a feeling of space.

During discussions it was stated that the application should be considered on its planning merits without speculation regarding future use. Although some Members stated that the plans seemed acceptable it was felt that it does appear to constitute overdevelopment that is out of keeping with the area.

Members having considered the Report, objections and representations, RESOLVED that the application BE REFUSED for the following reason: 

The proposed two storey side extensions including roof extensions,  by reason of its scale, design, relationship with the host property and its surrounding would harm the visual amenities of the street scene and be out of character and out of scale, in particular the loss of a linked garage, contrary to Policies D1 and  D4 of the London Plan (2021),  Policies 6 and 37 of the Bromley Local Plan (2019) and Policy DG5 of Urban Design Guide SPD (2023).