Agenda item

DEFERRED

Proposed single storey front extension with new porch and part side extension and conversion of existing garage to habitable accommodation, single storey rear extension, loft conversion with rear dormer, roof alterations to form crown roof feature and roof lights.

The Planning Officer confirmed to Members that this was a resubmission of Planning Application 23/00790/FULL6 which had been previously refused in June 2023 on the grounds of bulk, size and scale (as detailed on page 57 of the Report). The main changes with the current proposal are also listed on Page 57 of the Report.

An oral representation in objection to the application was received from a neighbour. A photo had also been circulated to Members showing the proximity of the Speaker’s garden to the Applicant’s property. Members heard concerns that the rear dormer window would overlook the neighbour’s property resulting in a loss of privacy, and that velux windows would be a preferred alternative. In response to a Member’s question, the Speaker confirmed that the use of frosted glass would be acceptable.

Members then heard from Ward Councillor and Committee Member, Councillor Michael, who stated that she agreed this was an improved application, being more modest and with less bulk, but the neighbour’s concerns were also understood and should be taken into account. The Planning Policy was in place to protect people from loss of privacy, outlook etc. Although Councillor Michael did not want the application refused, it was suggested that Members may be minded to defer the application for the Applicant to consider whether the dormer window could be replaced with velux windows or the sill area raised.

During discussions Members raised concerns regarding possible future changes to the property with the internal void being enclosed and converted into a habitable room. This would then contribute to the loss of privacy for neighbours. It was agreed that the current proposal would improve the property and fit in with surrounding properties and the area, although Members felt there was a need to put in a condition regarding changing the dormer window to velux windows or the use of frosted glass. The Planning Officer confirmed to Members that the application would not be able to be approved with such a condition as it required the submission of revised plans/drawings etc, it would need to be deferred.

Members having considered the Report, objections and representations RESOLVED that the APPLICATION BE DEFERRED without prejudice to seek revisions to the proposal.  Members requested that the applicant considers removing the rear dormer and substitute this with rooflights.

If the applicant does provide revised plans removing the dormer, Members agreed that this application could be determined under delegated authority.  If no revised plans were provided, then the application would be required to come back to the next available Plans Sub Committee.